Martin Berlet is managing director of epiAge Germany. In the following interview we talk to him about the present and future of the epiAge epigenetic age test. He also provides exciting insights into epigenetic research.
MoleQlar: What is the scientific background of the epiAge test?
Martin Berlet: The German-American bioinformatician Steve Horvath developed the first epigenetic age test in 2013 . It is based on the knowledge that as we age, small molecules attach to genes, so-called methylations. Horvath identified 353 sites on genes (so-called CpGs) whose methylation showed a good correlation with chronological age.
If these methylations take place at so-called promoter regions of a gene, this can, for example, lead to this gene being silenced.
Meanwhile, other researchers have also taken up this approach and further developed the “Horvath Clock”. This also applies to Professor Moshe Szyf from McGill University in Montreal, who developed the epiAge test.
MoleQlar: The epiAge test is based on the evaluation of 13 DNA methylation sites. Why are there exactly these 13 digits and not more or less? And how do you then calculate the biological age?
Martin Berlet: Prof. Szyf was able to show that it is sufficient to use only these 13 CpGs. This region of the genome in which they lie correlates most strongly with chronological age.
This reduction in variables has a number of advantages over the technology previously used. This makes the test more robust.
This is of course a huge advantage for us, because we were already able to “see” how epigenetic age reacts in our own test series. This is generally a fairly dynamic process.
The body is not a mechanical structure whose clock ticks down every second or minute. Epigenetics is influenced by many things. In a positive sense and in a negative sense.
This includes not only physiological factors, but also psychological ones, as has been shown in the past. To put it simply, it is just as important to pay attention to a healthy diet as to avoid stress, which can be a strong “driver” of the epigenetic clock. Meditation can be just as “healthy” as proper nutrition.
MoleQlar: What is important when carrying out the test so that it actually works and determines the “correct” biological age? In other words: What sources of error are there when carrying it out What do you have to pay attention to in advance when carrying out the test? (exercise, alcohol, smoking, food intake, ...)
Martin Berlet: An important point indeed. Unfortunately, we often experience that not enough emphasis is placed on the correct release of saliva, which can be reflected in a failed test. When releasing saliva, you should make sure not to eat, drink, smoke or brush your teeth for at least 30 minutes beforehand. Taking substances containing collagen or medications that suppress the immune system can also have a negative effect on the test.
MoleQlar: Let's look at an example: A woman with a chronological age of 50 years takes the epiAge test and receives a value of 65 years for her biological age. She then tries to live a healthier life. When does it make sense to repeat the test in your case? And are there interventions that have a particularly large influence on the test result? If so, which interventions are they?
Martin Berlet: In principle, we cannot and are not allowed to make any medical statements about the individual test results.
But the test may give you the impetus to visit a doctor again, or to question your own lifestyle and ideally optimize it.
MoleQlar: As is well known, epigenetics is a heavily researched topic. It is planned to adapt the epiAge test to new findings? Is there perhaps a variant of the epiAge test in the (near) future that is based on future research results?
Martin Berlet: Indeed. We are currently testing an epiSmoke and a skinAge test. The epiAge test is of course constantly being “improved” and the mathematical model is being adapted as the amount of data increases. But this is a completely normal process.
MoleQlar: The epiAge test takes an average of 6-8 weeks. What happens during this time? Why is the waiting time for the result “so long”?
Martin Berlet: We were able to reduce the effective “waiting time” for the customer by 50% through optimized processes. That means we are currently at 3-4 weeks. However, we see further potential to become even faster in this area in the future. Our goal is to achieve a value of approx. 12-14 days to arrive.
MoleQlar: The epiAge test is a simple saliva test. If the saliva does not “break down” over the evaluation period? Who or what do the scientists look closely at in the saliva?
Martin Berlet: There is a so-called buffer solution in the test tubes for the saliva sample. If the saliva mixes with it, the sample is preserved for a longer period of time. The DNA required for analysis is then extracted from the saliva and prepared for sequencing.
MoleQlar: In a recent study Mongelli et al. the biological age of 117 COVID-19 survivors and compared it to 144 uninfected volunteers. The results show a significant increase in biological age in the group after recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the healthy study participants. The SARS-CoV-2 virus obviously has an influence on epigenetics. Can it be assumed that these changes are permanent? Have similar changes been observed in other infections of a bacterial or viral nature?
Martin Berlet: Methylations are in principle reversible, that's the good news. But of course the question of intervention arises.
I have already seen studies that looked at the topic as early as 2017, long before COVID 19 appeared in the world. There is therefore evidence that coronaviruses, and COVID 19 is just one of them, remodel the methylation environment of their host cells.
How to treat Long Covid symptoms in the long term is certainly the subject of several research groups around the world.
MoleQlar: And one last question: What makes the epiAge test unique? What sets it apart from competing products?
Martin Berlet: The epiAge test is carried out using NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) and is no longer based on the chip arrays that examine much larger parts of the genome. In the epiAge test , each sample is sequenced three times and, depending on the sample quality, several thousand cells are analyzed in order to get the most precise insight possible into the “epigenetic process”. . The epiAge test is therefore much more robust and less error-prone than the other tests available on the market, which sequence less often and sometimes examine significantly fewer cells.
The problems with the other tests are particularly evident in so-called follow-up tests, where, for example, you want to monitor an intervention with supplements and their effects on epigenetic age.
Thank you very much for the insightful conversation!